Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Not at all. You are assuming the PM has broken the law and nothing anyone says convinces you otherwise, despite the fact that you have not heard the whole story.
My view is that the PM May be innocent after all and I’vetried to explain why, but I am perfectly prepared to concede that he broke the law if that’s where the evidence leads us. Once again, let’s make our minds up when we have all the facts.
|
I'm not assuming anything, you're putting up a straw man and then demolishing it. If you've made a solid defence of Johnson then great but I've not seen it.
I've always accepted Johnson may be innocent or guilty. But the balance of evidence favours his being guilty. That's why loyal Conservatives like Seph feel that Johnson is no longer an electoral asset to the Party.
My issue has been for the reason Chris outlined - your wanting to be on both sides of the barrier.
---------- Post added at 21:50 ---------- Previous post was at 21:46 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Acknowledging this is a good start, well done, you'll get there  |
It's been tough seeing the news recently - the war in Ukraine, surging energy prices and the uplift in National Insurance premiums. But when I read a story like this I put that all to the back of my mind and rejoice.
