Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
The points I have been making do not concern Johnson's guilt or innocence.
They're about your insisting everyone else waits until the Sue Gray report is out before commenting on the No 10 party photos we've seen, whilst giving yourself permission to comment on them.
It's what Chris politely termed wanting to sit on both sides of the barrier. I find it disappointing that you can't see the contradiction in your approach.
|
Not at all. You are assuming the PM has broken the law and nothing anyone says convinces you otherwise, despite the fact that you have not heard the whole story.
My view is that the PM May be innocent after all and I’vetried to explain why, but I am perfectly prepared to concede that he broke the law if that’s where the evidence leads us. Once again, let’s make our minds up when we have all the facts.
---------- Post added at 19:48 ---------- Previous post was at 19:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth
If I went in a room at work AND it happened to be my birthday AND there were loads of people there AND there was a birthday cake with my name AND candles on it AND people started signing happy birthday GrimUpNorth AND they told me to make a wish while I blew out the candles AND there were nibbles AND as well as work colleagues there were family AND friends there AND there was no sign of any work being done or meeting agendas etc, then I'd think I was at a birthday party AND I don't think I'd need a senior Civil Servant to confirm that too me. I'd think anyone who thought different certainly isn't Prime Minister material.
However you obviously think differently.
|
Well, all this has been said before, and all this has been answered. Yet still we go around in another circle. I’m not answering it all again if nobody’s listening. I’ll leave you all to play amongst yourselves.
The truth will out soon enough.