Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Andrew, in your mind he is guilty and you say that without having all the facts yet. I am simply presenting the alternative scenario, which you don’t seem to want to contemplate.
I’m not saying that scenario is correct, because I don’t know any more than you do, but my main message is to wait until we have all the facts. I find it amazing that such a straight forward concept as that is so hard to grasp. It’s surely what you’d say if you were accused of something you didn’t do.
I really do think that you want to argue rather than discuss. You may be right sometimes, but not all the time, much like everyone else
Yes, as a result of the big deal Starmer has been making out of all this. Who do you think people will trust if the end result shows that Boris was not complicit?
All of your arguments are based on your fixed belief that Boris is guilty. Even though you don’t have all the facts. Incredible
|
The points I have been making do not concern Johnson's guilt or innocence.
They're about your insisting everyone else waits until the Sue Gray report is out before commenting on the No 10 party photos we've seen, whilst giving yourself permission to comment on them.
It's what Chris politely termed wanting to sit on both sides of the barrier. I find it disappointing that you can't see the contradiction in your approach.
---------- Post added at 15:37 ---------- Previous post was at 15:34 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
If he knew that the events he did attend were parties, he will be in trouble.
|
Ignorance of the law is no defence, so if anyone was found to have attended parties, they would be fined etc.