|  06-04-2022, 14:44 | #1440 | 
	| Rise above the players 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Wokingham Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+ 
					Posts: 15,163
				      | 
				
				Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sephiroth  This is a compound situation on several fronts.
 First, there’s OB and his preference not to throw stones at Boris unless the Sue Gray report indicts Boris.
 
 Then there’s Boris who, conscious of his public image, may well have sought advice as to how far he could go in his own home.  The CPS will undoubtedly give weight to the”his home” factor.
 
 Then there’s the fact that Boris did know about the parties going on in his home.  Sue Gray ought to have found out whether or not Boris queried the legality of such parties; that makes a difference.  In any case, he should have put a stop to it after the first non-attending party of which he became aware.
 
 I now expect OB to reply “Well said, Seph”.
 
 
 |  Is it a ‘fact’ that Boris knew? The first thing the police will be doing is finding out whether he did know. Although I have to say, even if he did, he would not get a fine if he wasn’t present. If he knew that the events he did attend were parties, he will be in trouble.
		 
				__________________Forumbox.co.uk
 | 
	|   |  |