Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 30-03-2022, 12:40   #1787
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+
Posts: 15,086
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
The report's not out yet so how can you deem PMQs a waste of time.
I deem them a waste of time because all those questions were based on the nonsense being spouted by Dominic Cummings, a man you derided not that long ago for his capacity to lie.

Now, it seems, he’s totally believable.

Starmer would have been right to demand an investigation, but having had that reassurance, he should have shut up until he had the facts.

---------- Post added at 12:35 ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
I know!

Can you imagine the sheer cheek of people who think that the person in charge of creating and implementing the laws we all had to follow has to be responsible for personally following those laws, and be responsible for ensuring that those who worked directly for and with him had to follow those laws?

inconceivable!

Ignore those who remind you of his words after the North Shropshire by-election last year

https://news.sky.com/story/boris-joh...efeat-12497869
The bit in bold. Again, a judgement you are making before the facts are known.

As for being responsible for those for whom you are responsible is concerned, as you say, he has already agreed that, and he has made changes to prevent a repeat of it.

---------- Post added at 12:38 ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant View Post
Never mind Starmer - you were the one who repeatedly told us no laws had been broken. Now we know they were broken by at least 20 people.

Will you now do the honourable thing and resign?
The PM said that he was told that no laws had been broken. To his knowledge at that point, they had not.

He will not resign for the actions of his staff. He has already removed the culprits.

If the PM is found to be personally culpable, that is a different matter.

---------- Post added at 12:40 ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth View Post
Are you sure it was cheeseboard?

Lots of news presenter/readers now have strange accents . . it could have been smorgasbord
Maybe actually it was a clipboard.
__________________
Forumbox.co.uk
OLD BOY is offline   Reply With Quote