View Single Post
Old 18-03-2022, 12:15   #22
Mick
Cable Forum Team
 
Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,139
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
It’s unlikely that UK based employees will have contracts directly with the Jersey-registered company. There will be a UK-registered subsidiary in there somewhere. Otherwise it would be easy for any big business to evade UK employment law, by operating out of a territory with lax controls on what an employer can do to its staff.
Agreed, but this fire and rehire law mantra being passed about. Employment law protections still exist despite it, there are Statutory minimums in place that no company can legally go below of.

---------- Post added at 11:15 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

Just seen this though from ITV News’s Joel Hill:

Quote:
The unions argue that P&O’s UK crew were easy to fire because their contracts were issued in Jersey as part of P&O’s “offshore employment model”.

I’m told P&O has c50 Dutch + French crew, employed on contracts in the Netherlands and France who weren’t dismissed yesterday.
Mick is offline   Reply With Quote