Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
That would be on the table in any peace negotiation.
|
That wouldn’t be peace negotiations, that would be appeasement.
I wonder if it will be insisted that Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia leave NATO would also be on the table at any "peace negotiations"?
We never had to use tactical nukes to slow down any Sov invasion through the Fulda Gap because we bankrupted the Soviet Union into submission - it’s no different now, unless we let his blackmail work (by giving up Ukraine first, then the Suwalki Corridor, then Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia).
He won’t stop there, because, why should he? He will have seen his tactics work.
We didn’t let the threat of "Instant Sunshine” stop us in the Cold War, what’s the difference now?
---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Well, obviously if you were in charge we'd all be bathing in a thermonuclear sun tan. If you're not wearing Factor 15,000,0000 Piz Buin, you're going to get a tad burnt.
|
Mr Ad-Hominem coming to visit again, I see…
Can’t we have a civilised discussion with differing views without personal attacks, please? (general call, not specific to you).