Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Is NATO's position absolutely that set in stone? Could they look at the situation and think that the humanitarian issues are such that they will intervene?
|
Yes, of course it is, we’re talking global Armageddon. Several thousand dead Ukrainians do not warrant several billion dead globally.
That’s the harsh reality
---------- Post added at 22:45 ---------- Previous post was at 22:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
If it helps, I can re-phrase it "How difficult or how easy would it be constitutionally for NATO to get involved in direct action in Ukraine? Impossible? Would it have to jump through hoops? Take a vote?
|
I don’t the answer, but NATO is defensive not aggressive.
Given the potential, why would you risk attacking anyway?
We have a nuclear “deterrent” not a nuclear “aggressor” , (or arm twister) it is there to prevent an attack not to be used for an attack.
Ukraine are on their own, in regards to manpower.