Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Maybe, but he'll make a rubbish king. He has no cred whatsoever, unlike William.
|
Yes, but the charity issue has nothing to do with it. He wasn’t personally involved, we are told.
So he will probably have to apologise on behalf of the charity, like Starmer had to apologise in his role of Director of Public Prosecutions and BJ on behalf of No 10.
Neat.

---------- Post added at 13:39 ---------- Previous post was at 13:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Not at all. The man has an agenda and will likely not keep out of politics by pushing that agenda (ecology, architecture).
Also, unlike Queenie, Charlie does not come to the throne with clean hands.
He is indirectly responsible for Diana's death (he was cheating on her big time and famously told Camilla he wished he was a tampon). He is directly responsible for Harry's poor state of mind.
It's unfortunate that the younger generation hardly know the worst about him.
Anyway, his eyes are too close together.
---------- Post added at 10:50 ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 ----------

|
Bloody hell, Seth, is that harsh or what? I hope you’ve never done anything in your life others might criticise you for.
I was a Diana fan back in the day, but I suspect she was very needy and manipulative on a personal level. Charles has always wanted Camilla - it was not right that he was practically forced into an arranged marriage.