Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
It's not a question about being a Cummings lover or a Johnson hater. It's a question about misleading Parliament and the public losing its respect for the law-making process of the United Kingdom.
There's a good reason that we didn't need as strict a lock down as some countries and why our vaccination rates were so high - the public entrusted its elected leaders to make the right decisions. That trust is being severely stretched by Partygate.
|
It’s a question of whether or not the allegations are correct in the first place. That’s the point, and it is the point you keep ignoring.
I know that you
want the allegations to be correct, but that does not make it so.
---------- Post added at 13:28 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Thank you, Nadine Dorries…
"Work event"
How could party hats, tinsel, birthday cakes, "bring your own booze", be "reasonably necessary for work"?.
Anyway, at the time, the phrase used was "essential", not "reasonably necessary"
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/...ade?view=plain |
I don’t know how you think any of that is relevant. It was never against the rules to wear party hats and tinsel, eat cake, drink alcohol while working in the office.
I know you really, really want to prove that Boris was culpable, but do you see how flaky your arguments are? Prepare to crash land when the police give their verdict…