View Single Post
Old 05-02-2022, 12:28   #534
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,143
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Energy companies collapse

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss View Post
They would have to move somewhere and not have to pay a bill to get out of paying the £200 back because EVERY bill for 5 years will get the £40 levy.

IMO Already having levies on bill is irrelevant, this is a forced loan with a forced repayment plan that as said is unfair. Calling it a levy is just clouding the issue and trying to fool people into thinking we are not having our rights crapped all over
That's my point. They will have received the £200 previously, so it's not unreasonable for them to get the £40/year deduction at the new property.
What other way was there of doing it? Too many different scenarios to deal with simply.

You have to tie the "debt" to an individual or a property.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote