Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Hooper’s decision to use a talehandler to forcibly remove this manchild’s Corsa from his farm access was undoubtedly extreme, but a jury decided that he wasn’t guilty of dangerous driving or causing criminal damage as he did so. (If posting in this thread do please remember that the man is *not* guilty in law and refrain from libelling him  ) |
I wonder if the same sort of comments about the jury not arriving at the 'right' decision will come from this as it did for the Coulson statue trial? Will the AG refer it to the Court of Appeal for review to 'clarify' the law?