Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
When you have to resort to casuistry, you’re backing the wrong horse - but to be fair, you’re so far up Johnson’s fundament, you can probably see papa smurf’s shoe soles…
If someone authorises something that’s an intervention - they’re altering a course of events by allowing it to happen; before Johnson’s authoritisation, it wasn’t likely to happen, because pets weren’t a priority.
No. 10 are still denying he did anything…
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...espite-denials
|
You cease to be pedantic over use of words when it doesn’t suit you, Hugh.
Words have meanings, and if BJ says he didn’t intervene, most people know that this means he didn’t step in to bring it about. All he did was sign the proposal off - a proposal put to him to agree.
You don’t want to admit that of course, because like some others on here your judgement is clouded by your obsessional desperation to have BJ taken out.
My position? Just wait for the report and the police investigation. Hardly a revolutionary concept.