|
Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
How do you draw that conclusion? I am advocating waiting for the result of the inquiry before making a decision.
You lot have found him guilty before you have all the facts. But of course you are always right regardless, eh?
|
I "drew that conclusion" when you posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Ha ha! You find this trivia serious?
Well, if this is the most serious issue you think this world faces, you really need to get a grip, Andrew.
These were work colleagues who were together because the government can’t just stop functioning. If they met for drinks afterwards, where is the harm?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
I certainly don’t support everything Boris does - he’s often embarrassing to watch and his behaviour is sometimes open to question.
However, I don’t judge Prime Ministers by such trivia, I judge them by results, as will most of the electorate when the election comes around.
By the way, it was the scientists that pushed Boris into the lockdown rules. His heart was never really in it, was it?
|
btw, you never responded to my question - if he wasn’t there, why doesn’t just say so? He wouldn’t be prejudicing any Enquiry outcomes, and he would clear his own name.
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|