Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 07-01-2022, 12:23   #1222
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,247
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Never pass up the opportunity to swing the lead, as they say.

I doubt that to be accurate. in UK terms there are 141,000 available beds.

UK COVID data states 17,988 people are in hospital with COVID, that is 63% of 28,552.

I know the 63% was an England figure but if that was transposed to the UK, (which wouldn't be that far off) that would mean there are only 28,552 people in hospital total.

We wouldn't be screaming NHS crisis if that was the case as the whole system would only be at 20% capacity.
I had a quick look at the article. The headline in the article is wrong, the full sentence makes sense:
Quote:
Of the 13,045 patients with coronavirus in NHS hospital trusts in England on January 4, 8,200 (63%) were being treated primarily for Covid-19, according to new figures from NHS England.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote