View Single Post
Old 05-01-2022, 13:57   #3731
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,249
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Britain outside the EU

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY View Post
The problem with these forecasts, as I have said before, is that they emphasise the debit side and are unable to calculate precisely the credit side (as it is the future, and dependent on business decisions).

This is why they are so pessimistic. You can calculate what you have lost, but not what can be gained through new opportunities. Until you know what the private sector plans, that is.
They look at the whole picture. This is macro economics, not micro economics.

You seem unable to accept there is an economic cost to increased sovereignty. The two are a trade-off, like a see-saw. When one end is up, the other end is down.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote