Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by vincerooney  Aye no one objected to that before only because the dailymail didnt hate the BBC as much back then. They hate it a lot right now hence why the anti bbc message is so strong currently and people are mentioning their hatred a lot more....
 ---------- Post added at 01:20 ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 ----------
 
 
 
 its only 10 quid on virgin media isnt it?
 
 i've got a firestick so i'd be intrigued by what else gets "built into" prime but i'd expect to be saving money not spending more than virgin!
 | 
	
 I know it’s a well-worn argument (and thoroughly entrenched on both sides) but you don’t pay a subscription to the BBC.  You pay for a licence to receive TV broadcasts.  As it happens, almost all of the money raised from that goes to fund the BBC.  It sounds like a cop-out of an argument, but the legal distinction is important.
Besides, even if it was a subscription, you still wouldn’t acquire any ownership or right to future viewing of the content, any more than you do when Sky makes a programme.  If that show later turns up on a channel outside of your subscription package, you don’t get to see the repeat showing.