Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 08-12-2021, 19:56   #362
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,760
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Coronavirus

Sky News has a good explanation

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...sease-12489186

Quote:
For the last month or so the UK has been hovering above and below about 40,000 new cases per day. The R rate - the number of new people infected by each person with an active infection – has also been hovering around 1.

This means each individual with COVID has given COVID to an average of one other person. That's why the case-numbers have remained relatively static - the 40,000 people with COVID are giving COVID to about 40,000 new people, who are doing the same with 40,000 more people and the chain continues.

Over the same period, daily hospital admissions have been around 800. Meanwhile daily deaths have been around 135.

Put rather crudely, that means that about 1 in 50 people who get infected with the current dominant strain end up in hospital. Of those, about 1 in 6 sadly die. These ratios aren’t exactly perfect but they help with the maths later on so let’s work with them for now.

If the dominant Delta strain suddenly became half as dangerous overnight, while remaining exactly as transmissible as it has been, we would expect hospitalisations to drop to about 400 per day and remain there. 1 in 100 infections result in a hospitalisation. Deaths would end up just under 70.

However, if this new less dangerous variant was actually more transmissible, the impact in terms of the number of hospitalisations could end up worse

A more transmissible variant has a higher R number. At the peak of the pandemic the R rate reached an upper estimate of about 1.5. That means that every 10 people with COVID would infect 15 others, every 40,000 would infect 60,000.

As it keeps the maths pretty simple as well, we’re going to use that for our calculations – that's not a measured estimate of what Omicron might force R to rise to, or even a loose guess.

Some scientists have estimated that it may rise above this level, but we don’t know yet. We’re just using it to try and explain the relationship.

So if the R rate was to suddenly rise to 1.5, while the ratio of hospitalisations and deaths stays at the lower level - half of what it has been for the past few months, let’s take a look at what that would mean for the health service and public health.

After about a week we’d expect the infection level to be about 60,000. If 1 in 100 go to hospital that’s 600. If one in 6 of these people die that’s 100 deaths. These are both lower than the current figures, so good news

But, the nature of R means that each of these now 60,000 daily cases will also infect an extra 50% of people, so 60,000 cases would soon become 90,000, more than double the number we're currently seeing – and it would keep growing.

Despite the variant being half as dangerous as the original one, 90,000 daily cases would result in around 900 people needing some hospital treatment and cause 150 deaths.

A week or so later, 135,000 cases would see about 1,350 hospitalisations and more than 200 deaths.
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote