|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
The less likely is miniscule. Seen it, lived it.
But the crucial point is this, they still can pass it on and still have a high chance of doing so and that is what makes wanting to curtail freedoms of the unvaccinated, to bully them, coerce them to having something done against their will, to have the jab so they can what, still pass it on after getting jabbed?
|
What about the freedoms of the clinically vulnerable? Aren’t they being curtailed, and being bullied and coerced into staying at home against their will?
---------- Post added at 22:32 ---------- Previous post was at 22:30 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Absolutely yes. If it impinges on the wider population.
Life is not fair, far from it.
If we all have to walk to the pace of the slowest person we are all subjected to a long f’in walk when most of us can do it very much quicker.
You’re obviously happy to walk to the march of the slowest person, that’s how humanity has progressed through the ages……………
Those with issues should be treated with respect and helped as much as possible but they can’t dictate how the majority live. ( I see you must have read up on the precautionary principle as you went all quiet on it….good for you…..everyday’s a school day as they say)
|
Your sense of humour is only exceeded by your empathy.
Quote:
|
How a society treats its most vulnerable is always the measure of its humanity
|
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 02-12-2021 at 22:36.
|