Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 26-11-2021, 17:03   #8340
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,475
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul View Post
Maybe you should also try reading what you are responding to instead of just spouting nonsense about "risk assessment" which is totally irrelevant to the two questions.
I did indeed read it, and still agree a simplistic binary analysis is inadequate for managing a pandemic. A position I’ve maintained throughout and something I’ve never seen any evidence to the contrary.

My point was intended to address the point it quoted, not the many irrelevant posts that preceded it. That should have been clearer.

Last edited by jfman; 26-11-2021 at 17:06.
jfman is offline