Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
As I clearly stated, and I know it was a very feeble attempt at sarcasm from you, I am not a Dr so don’t address me as such.
In regards to your original bollocks article and the one you post here. Especially regarding your first bollocks article that was wrong about everything. Why would this subsequent post offer anything else of interest? A new variant may well appear at some point but there isn’t one yet after 4 months and if one appeared one, two, three or even four months from now, could you trace it back to July 19th?
I don’t have any papers published, great sarcasm attempt again btw, but the ones you have cited aren’t great either.
|
The irony.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=8162
Content to dish out sarcastic insults but unable to take them in return.
We all know you have no papers published but thanks for the clarification. As you tell us often enough you don’t care about the subject matter so it’s impossible to imagine you’d devote such time typing away at a keyboard about it. Beyond your extensive and insightful engagement with this thread of course!
In response to your post however I will acknowledge your familiarity with being wrong about everything. So ianch99 should give your post some weight on that basis.