Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 17-11-2021, 23:27   #8231
Pierre
The Dark Satanic Mills
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,094
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99 View Post
Disagree. Not liking something does not make it wrong. If you can actually read what I posted, it referred to the fear of vaccine escape from a vaccinated population. I was replying to spiderplant 's post where he said:



But hey, let's not let what I actually posted get in the way of a good rant, eh?

---------- Post added at 22:55 ---------- Previous post was at 22:46 ----------



Dr Pierre I presume?

Here's another interesting article on the subject of vaccine escape since this is your specialist area. After all, it was vaccine escape that I was discussing, nothing else but I guess you knew that

Vaccine escape in a heterogeneous population: insights for SARS-CoV-2 from a simple model



I hope you agree that this scenario is especially relevant for us today in country? I realise your papers are not yet published but if you could share any draft copies, we would all be grateful.
As I clearly stated, and I know it was a very feeble attempt at sarcasm from you, I am not a Dr so don’t address me as such.

In regards to your original bollocks article and the one you post here. Especially regarding your first bollocks article that was wrong about everything. Why would this subsequent post offer anything else of interest? A new variant may well appear at some point but there isn’t one yet after 4 months and if one appeared one, two, three or even four months from now, could you trace it back to July 19th?

I don’t have any papers published, great sarcasm attempt again btw, but the ones you have cited aren’t great either.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Pierre is offline