Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Your post posits otherwise...
"Collateral damage" is permitted (for lack of a better word) under the Geneva Conventions (as war is messy, and it can be difficult/impossible to only strike military targets without any, especially in urban areas), but there is no interpretation where your suggestion that sinking civilians in boats can be described as such.
|
Old Boy's entitled to change his viewpoint during a discussion thread after reading others' insights. That's a good thing. But it would make for a less confusing forum experience if he were able to acknowledge such pivots.