[OLD BOY]

Originally Posted by BenMcr

Chris Bryant, who is the chair of the committee, has said they did indeed give him a chance to correct them

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...IS-BRYANT.html


As does the report itself
https://committees.parliament.uk/com...n-paterson-mp/

The committee believes it listened to him and took everything into account. Paterson says otherwise. Should the committee itself have their decision reviewed?

I have heard many an appeal in my time where the panel coming to a decision was utterly convinced they had got it right only to be confounded by the actual evidence.