Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
It’s surely also a question of medical ethics to knowingly and wilfully expose the young to a disease for the purpose of boosting population level immunity?
It’s right there in the minutes that they’ve suppressed for months - removing the right of parents to make informed decisions before the schools returned and exposure was most likely to happen as mitigations and contact tracing were removed in schools.
It’s also surely a question of medical ethics why the CMOs all - almost immediately - overruled the JCVI non-decision they took months to make despite the MHRA approving the vaccines as safe and effective?
It is also a significant question of scientific ethics for a pseudo-regulator to make decisions and not publish their evidence base and rationale for peer review until after hundreds of thousands of infections have occurred off the back of it. -
---------- Post added at 14:47 ---------- Previous post was at 14:45 ----------
The evidence from around the world shows no such thing at all. However, evidence of the health implications of Covid-19 are always going to be dismissed by someone like yourself who has refused to acknowledge the health impacts since the very start.
|
What evidence? Our scientists disagree with you.
---------- Post added at 19:11 ---------- Previous post was at 19:09 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
It’s in there in the minutes whether you consider it reasonable or otherwise. The basic principles of managing a pandemic - testing, contract tracing and isolating were removed from teenagers in this country (for the purpose of boosting population level immunity) at the exact same time vaccinations were rolling out to protect teenagers in others.
I fully expect you to continue to defend the indefensible, so I’m content to leave it there.
|
Surely, because teenagers were rarely ill with it, and so there was no point. As I said earlier, it’s a balance of benefits isn’t it? Vaccinations also cause harm.