Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
It's not true though, we had as close as is healthy to 100% employment, if there isn't the churn of say 500k looking for and getting new jobs the economy stagnates and whilst there is 100k of so who are literally a waste of space and unemployable they're not going to fill the gap anyway so why should we have to be taking these jobs, I liked the fact we aimed higher and set higher aspirations for our children, you're happy in the slaughter house good luck to you but most wouldn't be and still won't fill those jobs so guess what, those jobs won't be there anymore and neither will the business that offered them
|
Yes, in a way I see your point . . . isn't this where automation plays its part, or aren't those jobs worth the money required to automate them?