[mrmistoffelees]

Originally Posted by nomadking

"expect they have a right" is not the same as "have a right", especially if the taxpayer is expected to pick up the bill instead.


When it comes down to it, people will still have to sell their "homes", and people will still gripe about that.
From official government document on these proposals.

I don't need that explaining, I'm actually kind of agreeing with you

---------- Post added at 13:24 ---------- Previous post was at 13:22 ----------

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

That's one of the things that needed fixing. Under any normal insurance scheme, you'd choose your plan and pay in accordingly. The insurer would invest the funds that would then grow as a bonus to the subscription.

It's perfectly reasonable for people to insist that they've been paying NI as much for themselves as for others. The scam has been that NI was not a hypothecated fund.

Hardly. There\s plenty of resources explaining how it works. it's not reasonable it's willful ignorance.