Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Sorry not in a position to post a link to today’s Torygraph:
I’ve been criticised for calling them the enemy but what else can be reasonably by said about that regime? All because the Guvmin wants to stop the Cookie nags.
Don’t bend over, Boris and do spit on them.
|
As with most things Brexit, the government is well within its rights to make changes to our rules. That doesn't mean that other countries or organisations won't also make changes to their approach after that.
Why would any country in the EU transfer data to a 3rd party country where they don't have an agreement that matches their internal rules as to how that data will be protected?
The EU made clear that their adequacy decision would be revisited if divergence happened, and that is based on their member states own views.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pres.../en/ip_21_3183
Quote:
|
Both adequacy decisions include strong safeguards in case of future divergence such as a ‘sunset clause', which limits the duration of adequacy to four years.
|
Quote:
|
At the same time, we have listened very carefully to the concerns expressed by the Parliament, the Members States and the European Data Protection Board, in particular on the possibility of future divergence from our standards in the UK's privacy framework.
|