View Single Post
Old 13-08-2021, 14:52   #9
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,422
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: London's Marble Arch 'Mound' disaster

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
I think this is something else. This isn't just an issue with having one of those shops but how many they are and how fleeting they exist in vacant units before disappearing again.

London rent is expensive. You have these American candy shops more commonly appear than a Pret or Starbucks does and no one is ever in them.

Private Eye did a piece on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/london/comm...ouvenir_shops/

Something weird is going on.
Possibly a rates scam too as a landlord pays rates on a vacant property but not on one occupied. Get a charity in, no rates. No charity, get a company in, it closes down after a rates demand and get another one in its place. Probably with no rental charge.

Why not reduce the rent so it's now affordable? You would then potentially have to reduce everyone's rent and you may have some honest tenants locked into expensive arrangements.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote