Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
You do seem to spend a lot of time and effort defending alleged sex offenders…
You defend Prince Andrew by giving an example that isn’t relevant (Andrew isn’t under 18).
|
Nope, don't know where you've got that idea from. I'm trying to show that whether an act is a sex offence or not isn't cut and dried. It depends where it's done.
As long as there are no complaints, it's acceptable to have sex with a 12 year old in Mexico*. Imagine if someone did that here! They'd be in serious trouble because it's worse to have sex with a non teenager.
* If Brtish citizens did this though they can be prosecuted by the UK.
Prince Andrew isn't under 18 no, that's why, if proved to be true, he will have committed an offence. If he had done it here it would have been fine from an age point of view (though there is the additional accusation of sex trafficking that wouldn't be).
---------- Post added at 01:44 ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
And he claimed accusations had been made about certain GB News presenter masturbating in front of year 9's, which was far worse than the original tweet on twitter and when pulled up on his outrageous misrepresentation he doubles down and starts quoting the law  |
That's correct, accusations of this nature were made. How many threads are you going to cross post this in?
To say you're supposed to be so shocked and outraged, you seem to be obsessed with what is now old news.