View Single Post
Old 28-07-2021, 16:24   #13
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 48
Services: Many
Posts: 4,662
mrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronze
mrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronzemrmistoffelees is cast in bronze
Re: Deaf woman wins compensation over covid briefings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
It is a big deal. This was one of the most important issues that we have faced in our lifetime, yet the Government didn't deem those with hearing difficulties important enough to be kept informed like everyone else.

---------- Post added at 16:16 ---------- Previous post was at 16:13 ----------



I doubt it, it was more likely done to advance the consideration of deaf people and the application of existing laws designed to help those less fortunate than ourselves.

---------- Post added at 16:18 ---------- Previous post was at 16:16 ----------



This is two too many. Every briefing was accessible to the hearing community, so this should also be the case for whose hearing is impaired.
Or, they made a mistake, whilst I can understand them being rapped over the knuckles and told to ensure that the mistake isn't repeated.

Compensation? Seriously? For what?
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
mrmistoffelees is offline   Reply With Quote