Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss
It is hardly a big deal and as they said there were subs. What is wrong with her reading? crazy that she won this imo
---------- Post added at 14:37 ---------- Previous post was at 14:36 ----------
if they had subs then they were accessible
|
It is a big deal. This was one of the most important issues that we have faced in our lifetime, yet the Government didn't deem those with hearing difficulties important enough to be kept informed like everyone else.
---------- Post added at 16:16 ---------- Previous post was at 16:13 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Just someone just out to make money again.
Funny how the "stress" of a court case had no effect whatsover.
|
I doubt it, it was more likely done to advance the consideration of deaf people and the application of existing laws designed to help those less fortunate than ourselves.
---------- Post added at 16:18 ---------- Previous post was at 16:16 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
170 briefings and 2 were found to have breached the rules, with luck compensation will be limited
|
This is two too many. Every briefing was accessible to the hearing community, so this should also be the case for whose hearing is impaired.