Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Nobody could reasonably be against that but is it really solving the problem (which surely must be the end result)? Or is it just moving the problem somewhere else? I mean people like Katie Hopkins gets banned from Twitter, she then ends up on Parler.
|
I agree it’s moving the problem elsewhere. Twitter/Facebook/YouTube, have all banned Trump, but he’s still about in the background and he’s still attracting huge swathes of the American electorate, if they think they have silenced him, they’re wrong and because of these companies actions, they have probably caused him to be more prolific, given the fact he was a former U.S President. So yeah, agree banning troublesome people, doesn’t fully solve everything. Just kicks problem elsewhere.
---------- Post added at 12:56 ---------- Previous post was at 11:48 ----------
Look at this today now from Starmer accusing the PM of failing to condemn the boo'ers during England game when they take the knee, except this footage shows he did say the England teams should not be boo'd.
https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/stat...75719568019456