[jfman]

Originally Posted by Pierre

given the vaccines are working, but we don’t have any real world data of how long the protection lasts a booster program contingency seems very sensible, unless like you, you are a lover of lockdowns.

It’s your misguided belief that “all is well” that leads to lockdowns.

I’ve told you, you can’t misrepresent facts only misinterpret them. The are, have been, and always will be low…..for the vast majority of the population, even more so now with vaccines and other treatment.

You’ve told me, and been consistently incorrect.

and by April (Spring) cases were right down again so, yeah I was pretty much correct.

Thanks to the emergency brake of lockdown. Not divine intervention or chance.

I’m not asking them to, but l’m being objective, which you certainly aren’t.

I’m not quite sure gleefully cheering as variants put tens of thousands to their deaths is objective Pierre to be honest.

Who said anything about “Completely Eliminating” risk. No one ever on the globe about anything ever, has ever suggested such a thing. That in the realm of insanity.

Again you’re presenting the situation is binary when it is not.

I’m pretty sure that’s what I have been posting these last few pages? In fact it’s been me telling this to you.

Just a small thing called a free society.

Alas we are back to you viewing the situation as ideological, regardless of the evidence in front of you.

Your love of staying in them is clear, is it a fear of freedom or a love of furlough that drives you?

Telling you that you are wrong offers no insight into my thoughts on lockdown. Neither does their inevitability. However they are inevitable with poor judgement and implementation of other mitigations.

I’d say it’s objective to consider things other than from my personal preference.

As opposed to being unaffected by restrictions, self-proclaimed privileged and deciding everyone else should take risks because I’m bored and ideologically driven. Death isn’t exciting for the dead.