[Pierre]

Originally Posted by jfman

I’m not here to answer for your contradictions Pierre. On one hand people being vaccinated is absolute - they are no longer at risk, on the other you are talking up the booster programme that would be unnecessary if your first statement held true.

given the vaccines are working, but we don’t have any real world data of how long the protection lasts a booster program contingency seems very sensible, unless like you, you are a lover of lockdowns.

Fundamentally you’ve misrepresented the risks from outset because of your ideological position against state intervention. And you will continue to do so for months to come.

I’ve told you, you can’t misrepresent facts only misinterpret them. The are, have been, and always will be low…..for the vast majority of the population, even more so now with vaccines and other treatment.

A mere day after the UK recorded its highest case numbers you were presenting Covid as state scaremongering.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=2722

60,000 cases the day before. Within 3 weeks we were averaging 1200 cases a day (over 7 days).

and by April (Spring) cases were right down again so, yeah I was pretty much correct.

If you didn’t believe the situation or risks were credible then why should anyone believe you are weighing up the evidence in a genuine or sincere manner now?

I’m not asking them to, but l’m being objective, which you certainly aren’t.

---------- Post added at 19:28 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ----------

Originally Posted by jfman

A vaccine can simultaneously be of benefit and not completely eliminate risk.

Who said anything about “Completely Eliminating” risk. No one ever on the globe about anything ever, has ever suggested such a thing. That in the realm of insanity.

At a population level that aggregate benefit rises the more people are vaccinated. I’m not sure how many times you have to be told this.

I’m pretty sure that’s what I have been posting these last few pages? In fact it’s been me telling this to you.

I can only think you have other reasons for wanting to open up fully regardless (including removing the use of masks) of evident risks. A position you’ve held consistently.

Just a small thing called a free society.

I’ve been clear the risk of too much, too soon, is always lockdown. And we know how much you love those.

Your love of staying in them is clear, is it a fear of freedom or a love of furlough that drives you?