I’m not here to answer for your contradictions Pierre. On one hand people being vaccinated is absolute - they are no longer at risk, on the other you are talking up the booster programme that would be unnecessary if your first statement held true.
Fundamentally you’ve misrepresented the risks from outset because of your ideological position against state intervention. And you will continue to do so for months to come.
A mere day after the UK recorded its highest case numbers you were presenting Covid as state scaremongering.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=2722
Quote:
Probably not, as that wouldn’t make it look as bad as it does, and we need to keep the country at peak fear.
At least this new variant seems to rippping through the population at a pace, vaccination + infection at this speed and we’ll all be done by spring!
|
60,000 cases the day before. Within 3 weeks we were averaging 1200 deaths a day (over 7 days).
If you didn’t believe the situation or risks were credible then why should anyone believe you are weighing up the evidence in a genuine or sincere manner now?
---------- Post added at 19:14 ---------- Previous post was at 19:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Your ability for double talk is truly breathtaking.
So you agree the vaccination programme is working and a success, and the vaccines are working as they should.
Therefore I can only think you have other reasons for not wanting to open up fully.
|
A vaccine can simultaneously be of benefit and not completely eliminate risk. At a population level that aggregate benefit rises the more people are vaccinated. I’m not sure how many times you have to be told this.
I can only think you have other reasons for wanting to open up fully regardless (including removing the use of masks) of evident risks. A position you’ve held consistently.
I’ve been clear the risk of too much, too soon, is always lockdown. And we know how much you love those.