Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
1) a comment by ONE person.
2) Not showing symptoms doesn't preclude them getting tested.
3) Your ire should be reserved for those that were last year demanding weddings should be allowed to go ahead with 300-400 people from around the country attending. Especially when people were caught have weddings with dozens of people from around the country.
|
I’ve got plenty of ire to go round.
Not showing symptoms doesn’t preclude anyone getting tested but if people are to ignore test and protect in what circumstances
would they get tested?
Almost certainly not where testing positive results in losing wages.
---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
|
If you’ve got a substantive point happy to discuss it, if not I’d call it a night at your end.
I’ve been consistent throughout the pandemic that there are no short cuts out of it. Others have clutched at straw after straw for 16 months. The latest being to understate the sweet spot where vaccinations reduce the numbers and/or that topping up the reduced efficacy of the vaccines vs delta with a few million infections is a good idea.