View Single Post
Old 02-07-2021, 14:00   #17
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,456
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Labour hold Batley & Spen by 323 votes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
On the contrary … you chose to characterise the Daily Sexpest’s coverage of George Galloway as proof that the paper was “rattled” by the result. Quite plainly you started the day thinking you could paint this as a Tory tragedy. Perhaps Labour’s media rounds this morning have helped change your mind - even now they’re carefully not crowing about the win or trying to put the boot into Boris. All they want to talk about is the local nature of their campaign and the quality of the candidate, which is how they conducted the campaign in the constituency over the last month.
The Daily Express seemed to be rattled by the result as it was unusually giving column space to a very left-wing party. That is a fair and justifiable stand-alone comment about the newspaper given its right-wing positioning.

To paint this as my thinking that this result is somehow a Tory tragedy requires a peculiarly big stretch of the imagination. Your unfettered loyalty to defend the Conservative Party from attacks is commendable, but I fear you're now defending it from non-existent attacks!
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote