Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
I would suggest you are wrong, and I would further suggest that this is the self-justifying excuse used by those who do breach the rules, by telling themselves "well, everybody’s doing it, so it’s alright if I do it", especially those who disagreed with the guidelines in the first place…
|
Everyone I know has breached the guidelines in one way or the other, and I dare say you have as well unless you are one of those annoying perfectionists who washes all their shopping and puts it into quarantine before using it.
Just for the record, I don’t think it’s right to break sensible rules. However, when rules don’t make sense, many people will ignore them.
---------- Post added at 19:39 ---------- Previous post was at 19:35 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
That does not jibe with your previous post, which stated
That’s not how planning works - the review of "where are we now" happens first, which identifies needs, issues, non-functional requirements, high-level budgets, resource requirements, and timescales. From those, a plan is put together.
Review current state first, then agree future state, then put together a plan to deliver future state - that’s the normal process.
BoJo said two years ago
|
I think you are being unnecessarily pedantic. I always assumed that we were talking about an overall plan. Since when have such plans proposed so far in advance included the kind of detail you expect?
It was a plan, that is all, and plans have to be fine-tuned and implemented.