Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Yeh, about that dog thing*...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a7166296.html
How about unarmed Blacks being shot at three times the rate of unarmed whites - is that because Hispanics are included in the shooting of Blacks in that statistic**?
I'm surprised you haven't be shot by a US Policeman, with that reaching... 
*perfect example of an unconscious prejudice...
**no, they're not... |
Quote:
|
In the UK, BSL bans the ownership of four different types of dogs traditionally bred for fighting: pit bull terrier, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Braziliero. Breed Specific Legislation was introduced 26 years ago as part of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 to restrict the ownership of certain types of dogs deemed to be dangerous to people.
|
Research has found that
in general you can't raise dogs to be friendly. You have to follow a process of only allowing the least aggressive of any set of pups to breed further. Eventually that leads to most, if not all, of any litter being less aggressive. That is how dogs were domesticated.
In the real world, which would most people prefer to have running towards them? Pit bull or Labrador?
If people wearing red shirts are more likely to carry and use guns, especially on Police, then stands to reason that more people who wear red shirts are likely to be shot, IF they resist arrest. If a little old Black lady reaches somewhere that could have a gun, they are less likely to be shot than a young White man who is known to be violent. Who would you be more wary of? All the stats prove that Black people are more likely to be violent than White people. Even Black people are least safe, when surrounded by other Black people. Labour MP, Diane Abbott sent her son to public school to get him away from all the dangerous Black kids in her area.