Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 20-05-2021, 22:36   #5225
Pierre
The Dark Satanic Mills
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,080
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
Matt Hancock confirmed a number late last week.
That you appear not to know?

Quote:
That 100% makes Old Boy’s statement incorrect.
well you haven’t offered the evidence of that so percentage wise.......I’m struggling to assign a weighting.

Quote:
I will remind you his exact words:


In response to the statement
The vaccines (pretty much all of them) so far, have been proven to reduce serious symptoms and hospitalisation by the high 90% ages.

If you want to disprove OB’s statement by stating just 1no. Exception disproves the rule.........well that is a bit ****, is it not?



At a straightforward level a single patient proves OB wrong. We do know it is more than that.

Your questions are very pertinent to the Government’s next steps, but irrelevant as to the accuracy or otherwise of OB’s claim.[/QUOTE]

---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:34 ----------

5? I’m literally shitting myself.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Pierre is offline