Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
More tosh Old Boy.
Surely the EU can just "shield the vulnerable"?
I see you've at least dropped that ludicrous tagline from beneath your user name.
The fact other governments could have made better decisions is neither here nor there to your original claim that I debunked - as I say it's a matter of public record - that they ignored SAGE advice on both lockdowns and this had a catastrophic impact modelled as tens of thousands of deaths.
|
Shielding the vulnerable was perfectly sensible before we had the vaccine, because without that all we could do was slow it down.
As I said, there were other aspects over and above the Sage advice that needed to be taken account of. The government listened to ALL the arguments. Taking a different decision does not necessarily mean you ignored the advice. It was not taken for the reasons we will hear about when the review is forthcoming.