Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Surprised the UK media entertain them.
Oh yes. Clickbait. Whip up the public into a frenzy and charge for clicks.
Money for old rope for the media here.
|
---------- Post added at 09:13 ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
56% are unsympathetic towards the Markles in a snap YouGov poll tonight.
|
Got a link?
---------- Post added at 09:16 ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
People can lie to suit what they want other people to think, which may or may not be the case, i'm obviously not privvy to that information so can only speculate.
Just to throw something else into the mix, take a look at post #9 and the other link here!
https://www.forumbox.co.uk/forum/thr...-pat/?pageNo=1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...e-concert.html
I'd put money on Harry not being Charles son, but without a DNA test (which they'd never do), nobody will ever know for sure. I'm surprised the press haven't got someone to surreptitiously obtain the DNA of the men involved- would be a real scoop for them and may allow the palace to rid themselves of Harry, whilst degenerating the reputation of his late mother. |
I do not pay attention to the gutter press because they always have an axe to grind.In fact I don't believe that the British Press/media is to be altogether truthful and neutral and hasn't been for the last 30 years.You need to stop reading the rubbish and speculation they spout or your brain will rot away.