Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Helluva lot of "what ifs" there, Richard - have you thought of taking up writing fiction, or being the Royal Correspondent for the Express or Mail?
Your initial premise was Hewitt was the father, but they didn’t meet until two years after Harry was born (according to multiple sources, including Hewitt)...
|
People can lie to suit what they want other people to think, which may or may not be the case, i'm obviously not privvy to that information so can only speculate.
Just to throw something else into the mix, take a look at post #9 and the other link here!
https://www.forumbox.co.uk/forum/thr...-pat/?pageNo=1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...e-concert.html
I'd put money on Harry not being Charles son, but without a DNA test (which they'd never do), nobody will ever know for sure. I'm surprised the press haven't got someone to surreptitiously obtain the DNA of the men involved- would be a real scoop for them and may allow the palace to rid themselves of Harry, whilst degenerating the reputation of his late mother.