Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I don't think anyone is desperately hoping for failure merely sceptical as to whether it was the right route to go down. There's a lot of money being put into studies to proactively demonstrate what should be obvious from population wide data tracking divergence of those in vaccinated cohorts with unvaccinated cohorts to remove the effect of lockdown.
I'm still yet to see an explanation for the test positivity rate of over 60% for unvaccinated over 70s in the last yet to be peer reviewed study. Obviously, when peer reviewed I'm sure glaring errors (or explainations) will get suitable prominence on the BBC website and other mainstream press.
I guess there's also the question of who is funding such studies, and why, when they wouldn't stand up to scientific scrutiny at this stage for any medical authority seeking to make regulatory changes (e.g. to the quality standard of randomised control trials) but they do make good press releases.  |
You never fail to disappoint ...
It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that you think there’s a deep State propaganda operation in motion here, and that yes, you do need the vaccination policy to fail and this epic display of straw-clutching proves it. It looks to me like all of the above is easier for you to swallow than the idea that el gov may have made a good call and a series of suitably qualified experts are proving it with sound science that has been fairly and broadly reported by a range of news media.