Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I don't think that's correct, Old Boy.
Everytime a virus reproduces, there's another chance for it to mutate. Locking down, social distancing etc all reduce the number of times the Coronavirus reproduces and therefore diminishes the number of mutations.
|
I understand your point. But time is also a factor. The longer we delay transmissions, the more chance of a highly dangerous mutation materialising.
Anyway, that debate has lost its urgency now that we have a vaccine. The annual boosters can sort out the mutations until it dies off of its own accord, which hopefully, it will.
---------- Post added at 12:41 ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
It categorically isn't correct.
This is, however, correct.
The clue is in the R number. R for Reproduction Rate. Lockdown reduces the R number. The fewer reproduction cycles the virus has, the few opportunities it has to mutate.
|
My point has always been that at the end of every lockdown, there will be another surge, so the number of times it transmits will ultimately be the same without a vaccine. The fact that this takes place over a longer period is my concern.