Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Having read this a couple of times, I think you mixed it up.
I believe you mean he [was] informing you, rather than not informing you 
Either way, I didnt know, so it was informative to me.  |
No, it’s right what I meant. He was not telling me something new. So he couldn’t inform me on something I’d already been informed of or learned much earlier on. I was going to remove that post but Hugh had already replied so was too late.
---------- Post added at 14:39 ---------- Previous post was at 14:29 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hom3r
I'm predicting the yanks will vote Trump back in, and he will be spouting the illegal votes for the 3rd election in a row.
|
I think the Democrats may actually try invoking section 3 of Amendment 14 of the Constitution. It’s actually going to be tricky if they do because the wording isn’t specific and direct refers to the office of president.
Quote:
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
|
I say tricky because words matter in the Constitution. Officer of the United States, doesn’t exactly correlate to the presidency. If Congress were to enact this, Trump could Sue in the courts.