Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Where, by who and what's the scientific grounding?
It is a positive puff piece by a complaint media or something supported by data?
The clue is where you see "if" and "hope". "Should" is a bit dubious if projecting meaning that wasn't subject of the trial and "expect" can go either way.
|
The
following article is pretty informative. However, there is some question over the accuracy of original positive tests, which could skew the claimed re-infections. Plus there is no guarantee that immunity lasts beyond 8 months (as yet), or how effective any immunity built up by infection is?