Thread: Newer STB's
View Single Post
Old 16-12-2004, 12:33   #94
th'engineer
Inactive
 
th'engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Middleton North West Manchester
Services: up to 30 MEG CF version of Peter Kay
Posts: 1,871
th'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to th'engineer
Re: Newer STB's

Quote:
Originally Posted by seaneeboy
But to replace all the pace boxes (which in the vast majority of cases work absolutely fine) would cost an unneccesary fortune!

Just because the best is available doesn't always mean it should be implemented across the board... especially when the kind of costs we're talking about would become an issue.
You do not need to replace all the Pace boxes as everyone has not got similar problems if you have TV only in a good signal area with low variance a pace is ideal .
If you have BB in an area of low signal variance a pace is adequate for lower speeds.
I think you must have mis quoted me as it was never implied in the original post that all pace boxes should be replaced.
th'engineer is offline