View Single Post
Old 08-01-2021, 21:01   #2312
Mick
Cable Forum Team
 
Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,137
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Re: U.S Election 2020

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
That’s why I didn’t say impeachment - I said disqualify him from public office.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/4125422001

FWIW I’m not convinced it’s an effective use of time/effort for someone who won’t run in 2024.
Disqualification still requires an impeachment conviction in the Senate, it is only after conviction in the Senate a further judgement of disqualification can be made via majority vote.

Quote:
The Constitution provides for removal from office on conviction and
also allows the further judgment of disqualification from holding further office. U.S. Const. art. I § 3 clause 7.

No vote is required on removal following conviction, since removal follows automatically from conviction under this constitutional provision. Deschler Ch 14 § 13.9.

But the further judgment of disqualification from holding future office requires a majority vote.
Mick is offline